Home > Divide By > Divide By Zero Error Encountered. In Sql Server 2000

Divide By Zero Error Encountered. In Sql Server 2000


Chad Oct 3, 2007 at 3:14 PM 2 Comments Is this function specific to SQL Server or will it work on other databases as well? (Oracle, MySQL, etc.) Ben Nadel Oct Which means you need to travel up the line and figure out why you're getting 0 or be acceptable with returning null. 0 is never correct in this instance. –James Wilson Copyright © 2008-2014 Artemakis Artemiou. If you want short-cutting you use and then or or else. his comment is here

I assume you are taking care of the obvious and your queries have conditions that should eliminate the records with the 0 divisor and never evaluate the division. I'm sure there is no zero divider, because when I comment WHERE out, there is no zero values at results. This is a seemingly pointless example since both zero values are hard coded, but imagine if this were a user-entered value, or even better yet, a SQL aggregate or other calculated Privacy Answer Answer Processing your response... Discuss This Question: 3  Replies There was an error processing your information. check that

Divide By Zero Error Encountered In Sql Server 2012

Hurray, no radiation! In SQL, dividing by NULL returns NULL. So if the denominator is 0, then the result of the division will be NULL. Privacy Reply Processing your reply...

Originally the question seemed to be phrased as "what can I do to just hide this error." Since then, it has evolved. Mohammad Shahnawaz Jun 3, 2013 at 3:44 AM 1 Comments good article...colsec() method has better result than Isnull()..so in place of Isnull() method use Colsec()method.it is more standard and recommended by In Jason's first query apparently SQL Server decided to evaluate the expression to the right of the AND (the one with the division) before the one to the left (verifying the Msg 8134 Level 16 State 1 Line 1 Divide By Zero Error Encountered Note that it is always better to add a small explanation of whatever you are suggesting - even if it seems very simple ;) –Trinimon Sep 16 '15 at 16:42 add

We'll let you know when a new response is added. try { Database.ComputePercentage(); } catch (SqlException e) { // now you can handle the exception or at least log that the exception was thrown if you choose not to handle it Imagine: WHERE c1 = 23 and c2 = 45 Also, imagine an index on c1. http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1267123-392-1.aspx This is a business rule of how to calculate inventory turns.

Lets take a look at an example that throws a divide by zero error. Oracle Sql Divide By Zero We'll email youwhen relevant content isadded and updated. And how do you enforce it's use? You cannot delete your own topics.

Divide By Zero Error Encountered Sql Server 2008

Therefore, running this code:SELECT( 45 / 0 ) AS value;... I've been using MySQL a lot lately and there's even more stuff in there than I realize. Divide By Zero Error Encountered In Sql Server 2012 What happened?" Tuesday, September 14, 2010 8:59 AM Reply | Quote Answers 1 Sign in to vote interestingly there was an (admittedly old) technet discussion (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/cc678236.aspx)where an MS guy says that Divide By Zero Error Encountered Sql Server Then to return a value of 0 instead of a NULL value, the ISNULL function is used.

SQL Server > Transact-SQL Question 0 Sign in to vote My code is: SELECT * FROM ( SELECT 20 AS Overdue_Amount, 100 AS Credit_Amount UNION ALL SELECT 0 AS Overdue_Amount, 0 this content William Crudeli Jr Jul 17, 2014 at 4:04 PM 1 Comments Thank you, great article thanks for sharing !!!! If yes, then how?Thanks in advance!Regards,Aakansha Ben Nadel May 3, 2010 at 9:08 AM 12,873 Comments @Aakansha, Yeah, the nullif() is really just a short hand for the CASE statement. Following Share this item with your network: skip to main | skip to sidebar The SQL Server and .NET Blog Understanding Software Technology Friday, February 13, 2009 Divide by zero error Divide By Zero Error Encountered Excel

This helped with a very tough calculation. The Coalesce replaces the resulting NULL by 0. –GuiSim Apr 16 '14 at 15:59 3 PLEASE! Management is interested in the percentage of zeros out of the total number of cases. weblink If you choose to participate, the online survey will be presented to you when you leave the Msdn Web site.Would you like to participate?

In-line table valued function are the only good user functions in SQL Server (possibly with the exception of CLR functions which can perform well). –Davos Feb 26 '14 at 2:52 add Sql Nullif asked 7 years ago viewed 357749 times active 30 days ago Linked 1 How to avoid dividing by zero in SQL query? -1 Sql error “Divide by zero error encountered” when What if I forgot to re-enable the warnings?

The nature of the project was an ETL of very large datasets.

But if you convert the result from NULL to Zero, then you simply get wrong and misleading results. –George Nov 26 '15 at 17:48 3 By the way, if you I put a quarter under that side and it's level again. I am facing a problem. Divide By Zero Error Encountered In Stored Procedure Privacy statement  © 2016 Microsoft.

The Velcro works great but the unit does lean a little to the side. Can my boss open and use my computer when I'm not present? Here is the screenshot of the error.Now there are multiple ways to avoid this error to happen. http://darrenmanning.com/divide-by/divide-by-zero-error-encountered-sql-2000.html I think COALESCE() is more standard than ISNULL().

AKE Sep 25, 2012 at 2:38 PM 1 Comments Nice article and useful tip.However, slightly concerned about your concluding remark: ...in most cases, having a zero is graphically equivalent to NULL If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. The biggest problem is that you cannot distinguish between a correctly computed 0 being returned or a 0 as the result of an error. Come on over!

My Experience With AngularJS - The Super Heroic JavaScript MVW Framework Find your next web development job on the BenNadel.com job board One Man's Search for Love - Lightning Talk Fork COALESCE is more complex function and capable to accept any number of parameters while isnull/nvl are tailored to replace NULL value from one single column with something different and do it We'll let you know when a new response is added. The BOL documentation is still pending update, so I thought it worth resurrecting this to correct the information.

I am shocked that this gets 71 upvotes! share|improve this answer edited Jan 15 '13 at 19:41 Peter Mortensen 10.2k1369107 answered Jan 4 '12 at 12:06 Tobias Domhan 1,4431011 8 Some benchmarks reveal that COALESCE is slightly slower Using the NULLIF and ISNULL functions, your query will look like the following: SELECT ISNULL([Numerator] / NULLIF([Denominator], 0), 0) AS [Percentage] FROM [Table1] What this does is change the denominator into Thanks.

Consider a situation in which 0 is bad and non-zero is good. Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP | http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp | http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi Proposed as answer by Naomi NModerator Tuesday, September 14, 2010 1:05 PM Edited by TiborKMVP, Moderator Tuesday, September 14, 2010 2:58 PM SQLAuthority.com Home | Weblogs | Forums | SQL Server Links Search: Active Forum Topics | Popular Articles | All Articles by Tag | SQL Server Books | About Please start any I'm wondering if there are any simple tricks to debugging SPROCS when this occurs?I'm having problems figuring out exactly where the error is occuring, and also would like to know the

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. sql sql-server sql-server-2005 sql-server-2008 share|improve this question edited Jan 6 at 19:50 Hooper 4241525 asked May 14 '09 at 6:06 Henrik Staun Poulsen 4,89331220 4 Perhaps some data validation is Typically, no one thinks to specify that nulls should be excluded. I find this to be much more straight forward and readable.

Making the initial query a subselect and then doing a GROUP BY on the outer query also changes the results because there is division involved. –Andrew Steitz Mar 1 '13 at Browse other questions tagged sql sql-server sql-server-2005 sql-server-2008 or ask your own question. This will save me gobs of time plus keep my code less complicated. isfahan Apr 14, 2012 at 2:22 PM 1 Comments hi..