English equivalent of the Portuguese phrase: "this person's mood changes according to the moon" Why does the ISS track appear to be sinusoidal? Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. Package texlive-binaries which provides texlive-base-bin is to be removed. dpkg: texlive-extra-utils: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested: feynmf depends on texlive-extra-utils. http://darrenmanning.com/dpkg-error/dpkg-error-processing-texlive-binaries.html
Processing triggers for tex-common (6.05) ... Unpacking texlive-doc-ar (2013.20140314-1) over (2012.20120611-1) ... Preparing to unpack .../texlive-full_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ... Unpacking luatex (0.76.0-3) over (0.70.1.20120524-3) ... http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/216063/dpkg-error-when-installing-tex-live-in-ubuntu
At least that is the theory ;-) TL 2016 is in freeze, so I am uploading the current state soon. The answer to tex.stackexchange.com/q/1092/7142 recommends creating these links using the command sudo ln -s /usr/local/texlive/2014/bin/* /opt/texbin –I Like to Code Dec 9 '14 at 18:08 add a comment| Your Answer In particular, bugs that are related to up-upstream, i.e., neither Debian nor TeX Live (upstream), but the original package authors, will be closed immediately. *** The Debian TeX Team is *not* dpkg: regarding .../texlive-base_2013.20140314-1_all.deb containing texlive-base: texlive-base conflicts with texlive-omega (<< 2013.20130512) texlive-omega (version 2012.20120611-5) is present and installed.
Debian Bug report logs - #824542 dpkg: Error in `dpkg': munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer Package: dpkg; Maintainer for dpkg is Dpkg Developers
Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook. Unpacking texlive-doc-uk (2013.20140314-1) over (2012.20120611-1) ... dpkg: considering deconfiguration of texlive-base, which would be broken by installation of texlive-binaries ... https://github.com/scottkosty/install-tl-ubuntu/issues/15 Reported by Stuart Prescott
If you have further comments please address them to [email protected], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. texlive-omega depends on texlive-common (>= 2012.20120516); however: Package texlive-common is to be removed. Unpacking texlive-math-extra (2013.20140314-1) over (2012.20120611-2) ... Often it also helps to include the logfile.
dpkg: texlive-common: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested: texlive-fonts-extra-doc depends on texlive-common (>= 2012.20120516); however: Package texlive-common is to be removed. dpkg: regarding texlive-local_2014-1_all.deb containing texlive-local: texlive-base conflicts with texlive-common texlive-local provides texlive-common and is to be installed. If I'm traveling at the same direction and speed of the wind, will I still hear and feel it? Preparing to unpack .../texlive-fonts-extra-doc_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ...
musixtex depends on texlive-binaries; however: Package texlive-binaries is to be removed. useful reference Processing triggers for fontconfig (2.11.0-2) ... Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson. How to assign a theme in Magento 2 using a setup script?
If you have problems with combination of packages in a LaTeX document, please consult your local TeX User Group, the comp.text.tex user group, the author of the original .sty file, or texlive-doc-si depends on texlive-common (>= 2012.20120516). Unpacking texlive-doc-si (2013.20140314-1) over (2012.20120611-1) ... my review here Processing triggers for tex-common (6.05) ...
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Do you have any thoughts on that?
Unpacking texlive-doc-mn (2013.20140314-1) over (2012.20120611-1) ... Message #15 received at [email protected] (full text, mbox, reply): From: Norbert Preining
I was coming from a previous texlive install that was provided by the Ubuntu repositories, and I wanted to update to texlive 2016. Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. Acknowledgement sent to Norbert Preining
Related 3Ubuntu Tex Live installation error1TeX Live with Kile in Ubuntu4texlive 2011 / ubuntu 12.04 and TeX Live Backports PPA4TeX Live — problem with install [Ubuntu, bash]; new packages14Latex on Linux: Thanks. texlive-latex-recommended depends on texlive-binaries (>= 2015.20160222.37495-1). Preparing to unpack .../texlive-fonts-recommended_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ...
I hope there won't be any problem. Preparing to unpack .../texlive-humanities-doc_2013.20140314-1_all.deb ... Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the texlive-lang-indic depends on texlive-binaries (>= 2015.20160222.37495-1).
dpkg: texlive-fonts-extra: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you requested: texlive-full depends on texlive-fonts-extra (>= 2015); however: Package texlive-fonts-extra is to be removed. (Reading database ... 212207 files and directories currently texlive-base depends on texlive-binaries (>= 2015.20160222.37495-1). Package texlive-binaries which provides texlive-base-bin is to be removed. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 824542: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824542 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems [Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)] From: Thorsten Glaser
Closes: #823805 - Check whether dependency restrictions are implied in Dpkg::Deps::Simple. dpkg: warning: ignoring conflict, may proceed anyway! Standard way for novice to prevent small round plug from rolling away while soldering wires to it Can 'it' be used to refer to a person? Notification sent to Holger Levsen
Removing texlive-htmlxml (2015.20160320-1) ... Debian distribution maintenance software pp. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached.